Coherence Selection Experiment — Success (P-Sweep + Gaussian Weighting w(s)) | Invariant Record
INVARIANT RECORD
HTML EDITION
ARU INTELLIGENCE INC.
SEALED-FIELD TOY MODEL
EXPERIMENT SUCCESS LOG
OFFLINE-COMPATIBLE
NO EXTERNAL LIBRARIES
DECEMBER 24, 2025
COHERENCE SELECTION EXPERIMENT — SUCCESS
A sealed-path demonstration showing dominance stability under nonlinearity (p-sweep) and structural weighting w(s),
including the critical non-tautological signature: selection persists even when crystallization fails.
Commitment Integral
C = ∫ w(s) · |Θ(s)|p ds
Crystallization
C ≥ C0 (C0=5)
Selection
b* = argmax Cb
NONLINEARITY DISCRIMINATES (P-SWEEP)
FAILURE MODE OBSERVED (NON-TAUTOLOGY)
SELECTION STABLE UNDER STRUCTURE w(s)
Primary Outputs
Base run + Gaussian-weight run
Base Run
w(s)
uniform (1)
p
2.0
C values
[10.000000, 3.750000, 1.498657]
Crystallized?
[True, False, False]
Selected
Worldline 1 (Sustained)
Gaussian Weight Run
w(s)
Gaussian (center=5, σ=2), normalized
p
2.0
C values
[4.952481, 1.859063, 0.382164]
Crystallized?
[False, False, False]
Selected
Worldline 1 (Sustained)
Non-tautology signature:
the sustained branch remains the selected worldline even when the threshold event (crystallization) is suppressed by structural weighting.
Selection and crystallization separate cleanly.
Figure A — Θ(s) Across Branches
Sustained vs wavering vs decaying
Figure B — Commitment C vs p (P-Sweep)
Nonlinearity amplifies stability
Figure C — Structural Weighting w(s)
Gaussian envelope centered at s=5
TERMINAL GLYPH
Θ → |Θ|^p → ∫ → C → argmax → ACTUALITY
© 2025 Daniel Jacob Read IV • All Rights Reserved • ARU Intelligence Inc.
Index Terms
coherence selection, p-sweep nonlinearity, gaussian structural weighting w(s), commitment integral, dominance ordering, threshold crystallization,
sealed-path toy model, computational experiment, worldline selection, failure mode (non-tautology), invariant record, ARU Intelligence Inc
Comments
Post a Comment