μ/R Evolution: Code-Based Modeling of the Memory Field Ratio μ(x,t) / R(x,t) — Inward Physics
Inward Physics / Memory Field Program • Code-Based Modeling • Interactive Visualization
μ/R Evolution
A simulation-ready, code-first framework where the memory field μ(x,t) couples to a resistance / curvature / recognition scale R(x,t). The ratio μ/R becomes a control variable for stability, presence, and emergent time-rate — visualized here with a live, high-tech field display.
What is being modeled
This page models two coupled scalar fields across space and time:
- μ(x,t) — preserved internal structure (memory density)
- R(x,t) — resistance / curvature / recognition load
The primary derived quantity is the ratio:
When Φ rises above threshold, the system tends to stabilize into attractors (persistent “presence”). When Φ collapses, patterns dissolve or fail to persist.
Why μ/R?
- It is unitless and scale-comparable across implementations.
- It is sensitive to both “structure” (μ) and “load” (R).
- It naturally supports threshold phenomena and saturation.
If you need an observable “time-rate,” you can map it to Φ (example below), without adding singularities.
Minimal PDE system (simulation-ready)
A compact model that behaves well numerically is a reaction–diffusion coupling with saturation:
Memory field evolution
- Dμ diffusion of memory density
- α decay / forgetting / entropy pressure
- β reinforcement via recognition (ratio term)
- γ saturation / coherence limit
Resistance / curvature evolution
- DR smoothing / propagation of load
- λ memory induces load/curvature
- κ relaxation / recovery
Optional: emergent time-rate mapping
High Φ → slowed time-rate (approaching collapse as patterns complete). Low Φ → faster time-rate (less stabilized presence).
Interactive μ/R Field Lab
This is a self-contained, simulation: sliders change the physics; the visualization renders μ, R, and Φ in motion. The result is a living field instrument — a future-proof interface for exploring μ/R dynamics.
- Top: μ(x)
- Middle: R(x)
- Bottom: Φ(x)=μ/R
Python baseline (copy + run)
This is the clean, reference implementation for a 1D lattice using a simple Laplacian. It matches the PDE system above.
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
# Spatial grid
Nx = 300
L = 10.0
dx = L / Nx
x = np.linspace(-L/2, L/2, Nx)
# Time parameters
dt = 0.001
steps = 6000
# Fields
mu = np.exp(-x**2) # initial memory seed
R = np.ones_like(x) * 0.8 # baseline resistance
# Parameters
D_mu = 0.05
D_R = 0.02
alpha = 0.2
beta = 0.8
gamma = 0.5
lambda_ = 0.4
kappa = 0.3
def laplacian(f):
return (np.roll(f,1) - 2*f + np.roll(f,-1)) / dx**2
for _ in range(steps):
mu += dt * (
D_mu * laplacian(mu)
- alpha * mu
+ beta * (mu / R)
- gamma * mu**3
)
R += dt * (
D_R * laplacian(R)
+ lambda_ * mu
- kappa * R
)
phi = mu / R
plt.figure(figsize=(10,5))
plt.plot(x, mu, label="μ(x)")
plt.plot(x, R, label="R(x)")
plt.plot(x, phi, label="μ/R", linestyle="--")
plt.legend()
plt.title("μ / R Evolution — Memory vs Resistance")
plt.xlabel("x")
plt.show()
Interpretation: what to look for
Attractor formation
- When β is strong, Φ reinforces μ faster than decay can erase it.
- Saturation γ prevents runaway: identity becomes bounded.
- Coupling λ increases R in response to μ: “memory induces curvature.”
Dissolution / instability
- High α erodes μ faster than recognition can stabilize it.
- High diffusion (Dμ) spreads μ thin: presence fades unless β supports coherence.
- High κ rapidly relaxes R: less load, less structured stabilization in some regimes.
Archive-ready summary
Canonical points to: http://inwardphysics.com/ (update if this post has its own permanent URL).
Comments
Post a Comment